![]() This definition is, among other things, used to classify a rebel group’s or a government’s first use of armed force in a state-based conflict. (relates to state-based, non-state, one-sided) “Armed conflict” is also referred to as “ state-based conflict”, as opposed to “ non-state conflict”, in which none of the warring parties is a government. Armed conflictĪ state-based armed conflict is a contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory where the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, results in at least 25 battle-related deaths in one calendar year. ActorĪ state or a non-state formally organised or informally organised group. A one-sided actor is deemed to be active if an organised group incurs at least 25 deliberate killings of civilians in a year. In other words, a secondary warring party does not have to, on its own, incur or suffer 25 battle-related deaths to be classified as active.Ī variant of this coding rule is applied in regards to one-sided violence. A secondary warring party is however considered to be active if it actively supports one of the primary parties with regular troops within the stated incompatibility. ![]() This rule also applies to settle dyad activity and the activity of the primary warring parties. (relates to state-based, non-state, one-sided, actors, dyads)Ī conflict, both state-based and non-state, is deemed to be active if there are at least 25 battle-related deaths per calendar year in one of the conflict’s dyads. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |